Stop "imagining" and actually try it.

On 7/3/06, Snake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would imagine this is a pain to debug, because any errors will be in the
> compiled pages (which u can't view I presume if they are compiled to
> memory)
> not in the code you actually wrote.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 July 2006 04:05
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Framework suggestions
>
> XML is certainly not easier for CF developers to use, but it does
> accomplish
> a few important things.
>
> First, it's not language specific. This is the weakest point because not
> many people care whether or not they can move their controller layer
> between
> different languages, but it sounds nice.
>
> Second, it forces you to watch how much logic you put into your circuits &
> fuses. A lot of people were shortcutting and taking advantage of the
> circuits, putting code like cfqueries in there, but the limited XML syntax
> forces you to stand back and think about your application.
>
> Third, it's easier to parse. I mentioned yesterday in this thread that the
> XML is parsed into plain cfml files, but it's not just a translation of
> cfif, cfinclude, cfset, etc. There are a few compiler directives,
> specifically the "do" action, which compiles and includes inline the
> contents of another fuseaction. This is what gives a lot of the
> performance
> benifits over FB 3. Instead of cfmodule or cfinclude, the code is on the
> same parsed file.
>
> So the syntax isn't simpler or easier, but the outcome is probably worth
> it.
>
> -nathan strutz
> http://www.dopefly.com/
>
>
> On 7/2/06, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >>The FB5 core is basically a
> > >>compiler that transforms the XML into vanilla CFML.
> >
> > OK, but what's the big idea?
> > Is XML any simpler or easier to use than CFML?
> >
> > --
> > _______________________________________
> > REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
> > See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
> > (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:245287
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to