There are 3 products I know for VPS on windows.

Microsoft own virtual server
Virtuozzo
And vmware

-
Snake

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 08 July 2006 19:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Hosting Options and Virtual Private Server

Thanks Snake. These will most likely be low traffic sites. But I don't want
any blocked tags that some of the cheaper shared packages have.

I'm not afraid of taking on the server admin role, and will most likely
handle that type of work for the client anyway. Currently I am a semi-server
admin for a higher traffic site. We have a dedicated, managed server, but I
still so some of the upkeep. It is a Win/IIS server.

Can Windows do VPS? One sales guy they only have a beta of that and all
their VPS is through Linux. He said that if I'm not a Linux guru I shouldn't
try that. But I think I could at least learn enough to set up some sites and
such. The VPS deals look like I would have to buy my own version of CF too.
Which I am open too, at least the standard version.

Matt

On 7/8/06, Snake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you get a VPS you will essentially be a server administrator, as 
> you will need to manage a virtual server. Remotely login and 
> patch/update windows, create sites in IIS etc, do you want that?
>
> If you and your clients want everything nice and simple with a control 
> panel that is provided for you, then just get shared hosting.
>
> What option you go for depends on what you want to get out of it, and 
> what thes esites do and how you want them to perform.
> If they are high traffic, heavy load sites and uptime is very 
> important, then shared hosting may not be the answer.
> The company I work for offers semi-dedicated as a step up from shared, 
> read about it here:
> http://www.cfmxhosting.co.uk/index.cfm?action=services.semidedicated
>
> Maybe you can find someone in your neck of the woods who do something 
> similar.
>
> --
> Snake
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 July 2006 19:13
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Hosting Options and Virtual Private Server
>
> So I have about 3-4 websites I am looking for a hosting solution for. 
> And the clients are mostly non-profit, so cheaper is gooder. I'm 
> looking for advice as to whether it would be better to just get a 
> separate account for each site, or do something like a Virtual Private 
> Server. I'm not familiar with Linux or Apache, but wouldn't mind 
> learning if this is a good way to go.
>
> Any advice is much appreciated. Thanks.
>
> --
> Matt Williams
> "It's the question that drives us."
>
>




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:245820
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to