Mark,
Before you respond to something to should at least try to read the
post and if you don't understand at least try to do the examples, use google
or ask questions. Never sit back and throw up your hands. You are only a
copy and paste away from trying the examples and you could not even do that.
Google is a great place to do research and you showed me you can do it . You
really wasted my time and everyone else's by not reading and not following
up with questions and not doing the examples. Your grade is "F".
Get off he private / protected method thing I don't think that is happening
anyway.
I knew you where not reading anything, that's why I asked.
Do the examples!
On 7/25/06, Mark Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Honestly,
>
> I couldn't understand what you were getting at in your examples, so I
> didn't read to far into them.
>
> In fact, more often than not, I really am not sure what you are trying
> to communicate.
>
> As far your examples that show calling private and protected methods,
> quite frankly I think that that is a relatively irresponsible way to
> develop, when you are breaking severe rules of a programming language.
>
> You are right, JavaLoader, or any other ClassLoader based system will
> not work when calling those methods, because they should not work, nor
> is there any reason for them to.
>
> Anyway, this conversation has gone on long enough, I think.
>
> Mark
>
> On 7/25/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > 95% of my post where scenarios in which the classes where not
> working
> > using the javaloader.cfc. And I do all my work using this classpath.cfcas a
> > foundation and nothing breaks. Did you at least try to run some of tests
> and
> > see for yourself that the cfc was not working with the scenarios I
> listed? I
> > provided you with three examples the forName() test, JDBC and JWS. How
> did
> > they function on your computer and inside the datasource manager? Those
> are
> > the scenarios which did not work. They are not small scenarios either.
> JDBC
> > plays is a big part with Coldfusion. I also found out that the classes
> > persist without scoping. The cfc didn't have any persistance by deault
> which
> > I think is good thing to have..
> >
> > Dan
>
> --
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W: www.compoundtheory.com
> ICQ: 3094740
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:247626
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
