Dan, I was trying to avoid saying this, but the reason I didn't look into you posts that deeply was because either (a) the English was so bad it was like having to solve a cryptic crossword or (b) you only half explained what your examples where and what the issue was behind it.
I'm not saying you don't have a valid point, I just actually have no idea what it is because you convey yourself so poorly. The only reason I was able to find the java forum post that I posted was because I managed to piece together some small part of what you were trying to achieve from 10 or so emails you posted, and even then it was a challenge. Several times I stated I really didn't understand what you were saying: (1) 'I dunno if I'm missing some context -' (2) '> Clear? Not in the slightest.' (3) 'I'm sorry, but unless you can explain yourself better, this isn't making any sense to me at all.' (4) 'Yup, still no idea at all what you are talking about. Sorry. Can anyone else point out to me what I am missing?' (5) In fact, more often than not, I really am not sure what you are trying to communicate. So as you can see, more than once I have asked you to clarify your position, and every time that I have stated this I either get (a) ignored, (b) restated in the original format that made very little in the way of sense in the first place. As to the rest - from what I have been able to work out from your posts is that (a) they can be done via a different method, i.e. a ClassLoader (which several people have pointed out to you), or are such edge cases I've yet to see how you even reached them. This is why I ended up saying 'I think this conversation has gone on long enough'.. and now I've gone and added more to it. Regards, Mark On 7/26/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark, > > Before you respond to something to should at least try to read the > post and if you don't understand at least try to do the examples, use google > or ask questions. Never sit back and throw up your hands. You are only a > copy and paste away from trying the examples and you could not even do that. > Google is a great place to do research and you showed me you can do it . You > really wasted my time and everyone else's by not reading and not following > up with questions and not doing the examples. Your grade is "F". > > Get off he private / protected method thing I don't think that is happening > anyway. > > I knew you where not reading anything, that's why I asked. > > Do the examples! > > > On 7/25/06, Mark Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Honestly, > > > > I couldn't understand what you were getting at in your examples, so I > > didn't read to far into them. > > > > In fact, more often than not, I really am not sure what you are trying > > to communicate. > > > > As far your examples that show calling private and protected methods, > > quite frankly I think that that is a relatively irresponsible way to > > develop, when you are breaking severe rules of a programming language. > > > > You are right, JavaLoader, or any other ClassLoader based system will > > not work when calling those methods, because they should not work, nor > > is there any reason for them to. > > > > Anyway, this conversation has gone on long enough, I think. > > > > Mark -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:247717 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
