For the record, this is exactly what happened. I was not being a smartass; I misinterpreted.
A better way to write the sentence might be: "All drivers should be type 4 JDBC( 1.2, 2.0, 3.0) and the ODBC server should be removed once and for all." Although I'd prefer to write: "All drivers should be type 4 JDBC( 1.2, 2.0, 3.0); the ODBC server should be removed once and for all." Anyway, that's enough of the English lessons for a CF technical list. As for removing the ODBC service, it doesn't matter to me as I never use it but some third party products only provide ODBC drivers. On 7/29/06, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Type 4 JDBC Is the driver! It's a driver type. The 4 means > > system or OS Independence. > > I think there's a bit of a misunderstanding here. Mr. Holmes almost > certainly knows how JDBC works. However, you posted this: > > "All type 4 JDBC( 1.2, 2.0, 3.0) drivers and the ODBC server should > be removed once and for all." > > In English, one would interpret that to mean that type 4 JDBC drivers would > not be present (along with every other JDBC driver and SequeLink). Thus, it > would therefore be difficult to connect to the database. -- CFAJAX docs and other useful articles: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248120 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
