Mike Kear wrote: > OK then . I give up. There is nothing about any aspect of ColdFusion > that could possibly be improved. > > Waste of time suggesting anything. The fact that I spend a > significant amount of my time helping my clients work through CFMAIL > problems is probably only fantasy on my part.
I don't know about your customers, but the ones I host get an explanation about how to use failto and spoolenable in their welcome message and that is enough. And for the record: I already filed an enhancement request for the failto attribute to do pretty much what Peter Tillbrook suggested during the 6.1 beta cycle (#50755, April 12, 2003). > What a bunch of negative thinkers you lot are. I'm bloody glad you > arent working on the feature list for the next version. There would be > no new features at all. There would be the features I needed for problems that I have not solved yet instead of the features for things I can work around. Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248134 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
