I have never passed back scopes from a custom tag... But couldn't you just be like:
<cfset CALLER.TagData = VARIABLES /> .... Or maybe THISTAG ??? Then all local variables of the custom tag would be passed back into one data variable... No hassle. ....................... Ben Nadel www.bennadel.com -----Original Message----- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 11:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Cost of global CFC variables I'd prefer not to have to worry about passing all of the variables that I do use from the CFX tag back to the function from the cfmodule. It's more of a generic question to see if someone has investigated any overhead. I've already incorporated what I learned about types, required and returntypes and the speed increase for that is nice. I want to avoid other bottlenecks. (the paper on the types,returntypes and the like has been in edit for the last 3 months, but I mentioned it at CFUnited as did Sean from his own research. I'll have it out soon.) >Would it help at all to create a ColdFusion custom tag and then call >the CFX tag within it? Since CF custom tags have their own scope not >shared with the general application, you shouldn't have to worry about >all the VAR'ing of function variables? Anything created by the CFX tag >(so long as its not set into REQUEST or APPLIACATION or something) >should be destroyed at the end of the custom tag automatically. > >I think this would eliminate all locking issues as well since it's a >per-page load , non-shared scope. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248809 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
