>>It is up to the vendor to supply locking, it will never be in a standard
Ok, it's up to vendors to supplies things to compensate for lacks in the standard, not the contrary. I mean if vendors develop new options, it is because they are somehow necessary, then it's a reason good enough why it should be implemented in the standard. After all, JOINS were new in SQL 92. Now it's in the standard. So should be implemented locks, that were new,... well with DOS in 75, and with dBase, what? Some 25, 30 years ago? -- _______________________________________ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252457 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
