You'd still have to architect and completely document your project. Your documentation must be extremely detailed, and then someone else simply types up what your documentation specifies.
If I remember right, the developers have to "prove" their level of proficiency with CF and with fusedoc and you have to create the test harness and documentation for every fuse you will need. The architecting is done; all that remains is to type in the code... it's fairly straight forward at that point. Other than the differences between coding styles you should end up with a manageable and fairly consistent application. That's the whole point of Fusebox :) My knowledge of Secret Agents is second hand at best.. I watched a friend work a couple of fuses that were assigned to him a while back. YMMV Thanks! Christine Davis ColdFusion Lead Nations Technical Services Prairie Village, KS 913-748-8044 ext 4703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Doug Boude (rhymes with 'loud') [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 1:39 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: SecretAgents recommendation? I was wondering if anybody has firsthand (secondhand will also be accepted) knowledge of whether or not it would be a recommended path to entrust SecretAgents.com with a large project? Their concept sounds great, just wondered if anyone had any actual real world experience executing that concept with them? I'm primarily interested in experience from a Project Management role, but any experience is much appreciated. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253078 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
