fwiw, in genealogy, the single point a child points back to is a
family entity, not a parent. A family has up to 2 related items,
mother and father.

The model will still work.

On 9/27/06, Brian Rinaldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't believe you could use Barney's component to manage this. It uses a
> method that Celko discusses in his book called the Nested Set model for
> maintaining heirarchies. In this case each item/node has a left and right
> position, and any node whose left and right positions are within that range
> is considered a child. So, for example, you would have Parent (lpos 1, rpos
> 4) and Child (lpos 2, rpos 3). While this has many advantages for
> maintaining trees of heirarchies, it won't apply here IMO. You can already
> see how this would be problematic for a family tree - each item/node has a
> single direct parent. I do recommend Barney's component for generally
> managing hierarchies in this method, and if anyone is interested, I ported
> it to MS SQL (I think his version is MySQL only) and wrote a flash form for
> managing "categories" within trees - it is a year old, so some stuff may be
> worth updating (i.e. some flash form stuff changed in the interim), but you
> can find the link here -
> http://www.remotesynthesis.com/blog/index.cfm/2005/11/4/Managing-Tree-Using-TreeManagercfc-and-Flash-Forms
>
> --
> - Brian Rinaldi
> blog - http://www.remotesynthesis.com/blog
> CF Open Source List - http://www.remotesynthesis.com/cfopensourcelist
> Boston CFUG - http://www.bostoncfug.org
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:254418
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to