> Oh yeah, and on the costs issue, don't forget that in addition to the
> staggering cost of MS SQL Server itself, you are also forced to run it
> on a MS OS - which costs another very shiny penny. Cost is certainly a
> factor - and usually the one board members care about the most.

Strangely, I tend to deal with companies that don't care about the 'MS
tax', no matter how much it is.  In fact, they don't trust software that
doesn't come with an expensive support contract.  I think most of you
would faint if you saw the size of the annual bill that a lot of large
companies pay to Microsoft.


-----------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is 
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. 

==============================================================================
"EMF <idahopower.com>" made the previous annotations.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:258490
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to