Yup, I agree with the easy Java. There /is/ a lot of cool java stuff out there. Writing cf-java is super easy, compared to java java, and CF has the nifty parts without the PITA parts, for the most part. d-:
The built in error trapping/handling is pretty slick, too. It's super flexible, which can be dangerous for the likes of me. :) Overall it's got a good power/ease of use ratio, I'd posit. [: On 11/8/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I looked at how java works with web services i.e axis and the fact that you > don't have to do extra work in CF to ship/send/ or receive any kind of > object is truly amazing. In java land its yet another issue. For java web > service on CF I have to WDDX each object before its sent and before its > received and decompile back again. It's a real pain and an extra step. You > can't put a price tag > on all the "magic" its priceless and its not just a bunch cool stuff to list > off either taken in total its a step ahead. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:260038 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
