Damien McKenna wrote: > On 12/5/06 10:24 PM, Jordan Michaels wrote: >> http://tweakers.net/reviews/657/6 > > Am I the only one who reads this to mean that MySQL is faster with lower > demand but that PostgreSQL ramps up better with higher usage?
That is how I read it too. It serves as a great example to show how the setup of a benchmark can influence the results. > I'm glad to > see them testing PGSQL 8.2, which was just released yesterday, but I'm > surprised they didn't also compare a development release of MySQL? Testing took several months (especially of the Sun Niagara), so it is actually a snapshot of PostgreSQL 8.2dev from this summer, i.e. not the version that was released yesterday. A development release of MySQL 5.1.x of about the same time was also tested, but it was unstable and the results were not published. Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:263016 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
