Hi,

No, the terminal servers is on another net, but since they are the only
ones with problems I was guessing that it has something to do with NLB
on both systems.

We run with multicast/no IGMP, and with a hub on front of the cluster to
prevent problems with switch flooding. And single affinity

The equipment is connected to the internet via Checkpoint firewall with
port rules etc.
(We haven't got any control of this other than wich ports to be open
etc.)

I'm doing some more checking after the upgrade to 7.x.

Anyways it's smart to switch to a HW based solution for loadbalancing. 
It's better than Windows NLB clustering on most aspects?

Helge

-----Original Message-----
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 31. januar 2007 09:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What hw to use for loadbalancing

WebSite CFtalk wrote:
> The problem is not always there, but happens especially with one 
> customer using clustered terminal servers and Internet Explorer.
> 
> It seems that they are always connected to one of the cluster nodes

Are the terminal servers in the same subnet as your cluster? If so, what
is the ARP timeout on the system? If not, what is the ARP timeout on the
upstream router of your cluster? Do you have port security enabled on
your network equipment? Are you using multicast and / or IGMP? How is
multicast configured on your switch / router? Do you have single
affinity set? 


> they experience drops regularly, also when all jrun/cf instances is up

> and running.

I would look into the combination of NLB with your network equipment.
ISTM this is a problem where the network directs the traffic to one
server, where NLB tries to direct the traffic to another server.


> We're shortly going to upgrade to 7.x (running 6.1 right now), but I 
> believe that the problem is with NLB clustering - maybe when the other

> end is also NLB.
> 
> The plan is to switch to a HW based solution for this reason and also 
> since it obviously would be a better and more stable/powerful
solution.

This all sounds very vague to me. Wouldn't it be better to thoroughly
investigate the issue before investing in new hardware? Or at least get
something from a vendor on a try before you buy basis.

Jochem



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268178
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to