I'd move to it for all my smaller clients who cannot afford a copy of CF or BD (and that's quite a few). I'd want to download and play with it first though. I wrote and told them along time ago that it wasn't worth my time if it didn't support CFCs. They wrote back recently to tell me that the new version *does* support them. I still haven't tried the switch, but probably will fairly soon.
Brad Wood wrote: > The same argument could have been made for BD when it first came out. > A similar argument could have probably been made for CF when it's first > clunky version hit shelves. > > I've never tried Smith, but I still think it is cool. > > ~Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 4:52 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Take a minute to Digg this story about the Smith Project > > And more to the point, who cares? Not to be the spoiler of the partay > but I > mean in all reality how many people, currently on CF/BD would consider a > move to "Smith"? just because it is free. > > I would wager not that many, if any. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268757 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
