Similar experiences on our end. We picked up FR about a year ago when we were having some issues. My boss had used SeeFusion at a previous position, but we downloaded FR to give it a try, and so he could see the differences. We had been going back and forth on the same issue for about a week prior, after install we pegged down the issue (and several others as well) within 5 minutes. It, literally, payed for itself in 5 minutes, saving us at least 10 times it's cost in keeping recurring revenue. We have it on four production servers, one development server, and have just picked up twice that number of licenses to support the new datacenter we are building. And, the new interface does rock:)
Cutter ______________ http://blog.cutterscrossing.com DURETTE, STEVEN J (ASI-AIT) wrote: > I've heard good things about both. I use FusionReactor though. The > cost structure is what made our final decision. FusionReactor can be > licensed by server and that covers as many instances you have on that > server. SeeFusion is licensed per instance. When we did the math for > how many instances we have FusionReactor came in at a lower cost and we > don't have to worry about purchasing another license if we have to add > another instance. > > Also, we got it because we were having random problems with the server > that weeks of reading IIS/CF/JRun logs didn't solve. We installed FR > and within 45 minutes we found out that a particular user was pulling a > report in such a way as to almost bring every record in the db into a > report. Quick change to the code to prevent it and the server stopped > having problems. > > Steve > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 11:24 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: FusionReactor? > > > Ditto on the SeeFusion. I have heard good things on both tools. I use > SeeFusion. SeeFusion uses a Flex 2 interface, has been in this business > longer than Fusion-Reactor, and arguably has a smaller server footprint > based on a feature set specifically limited for monitoring purposes. > > ~Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Luce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:52 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: FusionReactor? > > I've heard good things about Fusion Reactor, but I use SeeFusion. I > recommend it highly. > > Greg > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:269141 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
