"the fact that NAMBLA entails underage boys makes it illegal," Apparently, it's not illegal to promote the idea of it, hence their website.
And, yes, any corporation concerned about their image would probably disassociate themselves from a technology which would tarnish their corporate image. Corporations are *very* sensitive to this. Those of you who work for corporations... ask you supervisor about this issue and see what response you get and let us know. Rick -----Original Message----- From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 4:12 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site sorry, but you said (and I quote): "...that most (corporations) would immediately instruct their IT departments to change their technology usage..." which certainly seems to imply that they'd move off of CF, so I stand by my rebuttal. As far as your NAMBLA argument... the fact that NAMBLA entails underage boys makes it illegal, and the fact that it's illegal makes it a moot point as far as this discussion goes since early on Rey made the very explicit distinction of "illegal porn". On 3/5/07, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My argument is not that they would refuse the technology > because it's used by business they would rather not associate with... > I think they would *not* want to be posted on a site like Rey's > if they're going to be listed with porn sites. > > It's the association, not the technology that's the issue... > > Rick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2 Build sales & marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade now http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:271628 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
