On 3/6/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then surely the CMS isn't doing it's job? They are coding when the CMS > should be managing the work?
ONLY if you rigidly define the CMS' job by your definition. What if the customer -- who owns the system, after all, and is paying you to achieve *their* desired results -- doesn't see it your way? > I can see your stance but the fact they are now coding ad-hoc (and no doubt > the JS will not be checked) they could wreak havoc either deliberate or > otherwise. There is actually a team review feature that allows one or more designated individuals to sign off onthe proposed published work. Although I'll say right off that the client is self-approving the work. Yes the system could be abused. Just as the automobile could be rammed into a sidewalk crowded with people, generating horrific results. But you don't see automobiles banned for this reason. Yes the consequences could be bad. But just as its possible to find safe drivers, there are safe editorial users. Is it perfect? Of course not, but its an acceptable level of risk according to an informed decision on the part of the site owner. > More to the point... Telltales? Some goofball Google-esque thing, I think, that tracks page placement or something. I don't know what the hell it is. They just screamed until I got the system to take it without them emailing me telling me it still doesn't work. And yes, I started the whole deal with "you don't want to do that". They did. :-) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Janitor, The Robertson Team mysecretbase.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:271808 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
