I'll agree with Mark here. While I personally can't think of a reason for a CFC to be instantiated into the session scope, i'd avoid such a sweeping generalization.
Blanket statements like that are always incorrect. Period. :) On 4/6/07, Gaulin, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, why not? Blanket statements like that sound fishy to me is all, > but if there's a good reason behind it... like maybe because lots of > sessions can be created by a crawler, for example. (But that could be > checked for an avoided.) > Thanks > Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 2:31 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Using CFCs in session scope - need cflock help > > You shouldn't be putting CFCs in the session scope... Period. I would > try and find and alternative method for calling/instantiating them. > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2 Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:274716 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
