Developer skillset, personal preference, and the app(s) in question are the only important criteria. If those were irrelevant, there would be only one framework in any given arena, because there wouldn't be anything to differentiate. Competing frameworks arise (like anything else) because the existing offerings didn't meet a given entity's need.
Honestly, I can't think of anything else that would differentiate a framework in a meaninful way, except perhaps LOC for different tasks, but even that is dependent on the app you're trying to develop, because there will be different tasks to perform depending on the app. cheers, barneyb On 5/2/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, I get confused on why it would "depend". If this was the case then > it would be easy to choose a framework. > > Is it that if you want OO dev you choose Mach-II etc. Disregard skillset > for this, imagine it was an open playing field and we all knew the same > stuff and we all wanted to build the same app. > > What makes one framework more suitable for a particular project over another > (other then personal preference) > -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 100 invites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:276856 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
