But this in itself is great as it gives anyone looking to build an app who needs to have that degree of control to immediately dismiss Fusebox and in turn to select the "correct" framework (for the job).
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -----Original Message----- From: Barney Boisvert To: CF-Talk Sent: Wed May 02 23:49:20 2007 Subject: Re: Which Framework do you use... (if any) I would pick Fusebox w/ ColdSpring by default. But if the application processing required a significant number of dynamic state changes at the controller level, I'd probably go with Model-Glue w/ ColdSpring. FB's execution path is static, so it's not a good fit for complex dynamic flow processing. A dynamically driven framework (Mach-II or Model-Glue) would be a better fit for that situation. So it depends. :) cheers, barneyb On 5/2/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But to add, I can understand personal preference as it's human nature to > like something as an individual, what I don't yet see is where the "it > depends" approach comes in to play. We have had skillset, project and > budget as listings. So if we had say a theoretical team of 7 developers all > skilled in ColdFusion, CFCs and proficient OO developers wanting to build a > scalable enterprise level applications what would I choose? > > Surely this now gives us a focus to narrow it down? > > If a set of rules / problems had a dependency then it would be easily to > find a better solution > > Maybe I am over thinking it, and no doubt I am, but the "it depends" for me > is still unanswered... Or maybe we need a framework to choose a framework? > > :-) > > > > "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, > Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, > Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the > intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note > that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have > received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call > our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this > communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." > Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Charlie Griefer > To: CF-Talk > Sent: Wed May 02 23:21:28 2007 > Subject: Re: Which Framework do you use... (if any) > > On 5/2/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Again, I get confused on why it would "depend". If this was the case then > > it would be easy to choose a framework. > > > > Is it that if you want OO dev you choose Mach-II etc. Disregard skillset > > for this, imagine it was an open playing field and we all knew the same > > stuff and we all wanted to build the same app. > > > > What makes one framework more suitable for a particular project over > another > > (other then personal preference) > > Why are you so laser focused on believing that one has to "just be > better" than any other? > > Why *can't* it be personal preference? It's not an "open playing > field" and we don't all know the same stuff. > > I just recently got into fusebox and chose it because i didn't have > any prior experience with frameworks and figured it would likely be > the easiest for me to learn. > > Next I'm leaning towards Coldbox because I've heard that it's got > ridiculous amounts of documentation available which again... would > make it easier for me to learn. > > But I don't for a second believe that one is "just better" than any > other. If that were the case, the others wouldn't exist. > > Yes, a Lexus is "better" than a Yugo. But a Lexus also costs more > than a Yugo. Comparing cars to frameworks in this context doesn't > really work. > > I really think the reason you're having a problem getting the answer > that you're looking for is because you're discounting the only right > answer which is... "it depends" / "personal preference" :) > > -- > Charlie Griefer > > ================================================ > "...All the world shall be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies, > and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch > you, digger, listener, runner, prince with a swift warning. > Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed." > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Macromedia ColdFusion MX7 Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-saving features, more productivity. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJW Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:276864 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
