> I didn't take your comments that way. > [snip] Jon, I didn't wanna repeat all you wrote because I just wanted to add that it was a great reply. I totally see where you and Barney are coming from... both yours and Barney's comments made absolutely perfect sense. I get the subtleties of a "framework" vs. a "methodology" and I now understand a lot better about how to go forward and implement what I'm looking for.
This has been a great thread. Appreciate all the help tremendously. I think a "Frameworks Overview" needs to be added to the Max conference this year. Not a debate. Not a "discussion" or a "Birds of a Feather"... but a nice, healthy overview of the frameworks available to ColdFusion programmers, and their "strengths" and "weaknesses" as described by you and Barney. Dammit, I wish they were still taking submissions... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe® Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7. Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:276960 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
