I cant speak about Frameworks in general, but I can tell you to avoid FuseBox like the plague.
> Now this is just a rediculous idea. There are thousands of Fusebox developers out there writing tens of thousands of applications with various degrees of success I'm sure, but I don't think it's a stretch to say that the success rate, mainatinability and scalability of these apps are above the average no-framework project. If all you ever coded in was fusebox, then maybe its an OK framework to work > with. > It sounds like some folks didn't want to learn it so they claimed it was hard to understand. We hired a new developer who told us that FuseBox was the bomb and that he > knew it. We gave him a specific project to code using FuseBox and to this > day we regret it. The code is so difficult to read, understand and debug > that any possible gain in the form of reusable code is immediately lost many > times over in finding the code you intend to reuse. > It's quite possible the guy didn't build a "good" Fusebox application (I've done that). But even my bad one's are better than the average spaghetti-code. Maybe the project was too large for FuseBox. Maybe the guy was incompetent > (he no longer works for us). But we deeply regret allowing him to code that > project in FuseBox and have not even considered using it again. > Was MySpace too large for Fusebox? Come on! It's quite possible the guy was incompetent, but for a reasonably intelligent programmer to say that Fusebox code is hard to read tells me they just didn't try. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:278471 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
