What I said was that we do plan on releasing updates, but I did not comment on how regularly we'd do this. I also said, when asked, that you are free to tinker with the bits yourself, and if the newer bits are really backwards compatible then it should work, but suggested that if you do opt to tinker with these files then make sure you have a backup first. ;-)
--- Ben -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Cyr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 8:51 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cf8 cftextarea richtext - niggles This is important to get confirmed. My chat with the dev team a few weeks ago indicated they wouldn't be releasing updates as often as fck does. They changed some core fck files (file browsing for example) for security reasons and thus it isn't the exact same code as from the fck site. And that replacing it would cause support issues. That said I imagine replacing the code would be pretty easy if you have access to the server. On 5/31/07, Brad Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, someone asked the same thing at the KC user meeting. Ben seemed > to think that even though it would have default settings, it would still > be fully customizable and you would have access to all the JS > configuration files. > I think I also recall Ben confirming that CF8 would ship with the latest > version of FCK editor and that it would be upgradeable. > > ~Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:31 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: cf8 cftextarea richtext - niggles > > I think Ben would be the best to answer this...Bu I believe that it can > be > replaced with a newer version. Someone asked this at the Chicago CFUG > meeting and I believe he mentioned this...Ben... > > Eric > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Weikert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:51 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: cf8 cftextarea richtext - niggles > > I use FCK in my app, and I've ended up having to hack it to a certain > degree to add some project-specific goodies. So in my case, if/when we > move to CF8, I'll still be using FCK independently. > > I figure the inclusion of FCK into CF8 is going to be a "here's > something simple and handy" feature, that harder-core devs who need more > > out of it will skip in favor of the standalone FCK code. *shrug* > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe® Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7. Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:279821 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
