Since Fusebox 4.1 and the incorporation of the total rewrite it has been a priority to make all new releases of FB be backwards compatible. Essentially anything that runs in 5 is going to work in 5.5 and 6.0.
I would say start to dive in now since there isn't going to be such a large rewrite in the future where you are going to have to learn a bunch of new things. The changes like we saw in 3 > 4.1 are not going to happen in a future release for a very very long time. J.J. M On 6/16/07, Dwayne Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I stopped using fusebox once FB3 was implement. It just got a little to > complex for me. However I stuck with the basic concepts of fuses and > circuites. My circuit files are still basically one big cfswitch / cfcase > tag. > > I am considering moveing to FB5. It seems attractive becuase the Fusebox > Framework appears to be blackbox and it seems that I don't need to ticker > with any non-value added details. > > I am also attracted to the concept of converting my cfswitch structure to > a nice circuit.xml file. Furthermore the dot notation for the fuseaction > request is very appealing; now my "index.cfm?action= > browseFirm&perform=showService List" can be replaced with "index.cfm?fuseacti > on=browseFirm. showServiceList" Cool. > > Basically I like alot about th FB5 format but now there's talk about FB6 > or FBMX. Should I wait? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe® Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7. Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:281384 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
