Lotsa thanks JJ. Thatâs what I originally thought it was, but I was not entirely sure if there was any other inherent and unique properties of the application.cfm/cfc that makes it different from the standard cf template.
Again, thanks... if there are any other folks who think otherwise, please continue the thread. Otherwise, JJ answered my question. > -----Original Message----- > From: J.J. Merrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:28 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Using cfinclude and udfs on application.cfm > > The application.cfm runs prior to all pages thus is nothing really > "special" > about it. it is just called that because it is a nice place to put > application level variables. So to answer your question YES it is ok to > put > a cfinclude inside of it and I do that often. > > J.J. M > > On 6/16/07, Michael E. Carluen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi all. I am updating a legacy app that is still using an > application.cfm > > (not a .cfc). The update simply adds a cfinclude tag for a udf > > library. Is > > there anything "illegal" (for a lack of a better term) about adding > > cfincludes on an application.cfm? > > > > It works, but would like to confirm whether or not the practice is not > > recommended or would post a risk down the line. > > > > Thanks all. > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion 8 beta â Build next generation applications today. Free beta download on Labs http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs_adobecf8_beta Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:281386 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
