So, I have to agree with Dale... Adobe has put a bullet in CF. For example, 
Standard Edition would be fine for me but I need Oracle access and now I need 
to pay twice that just to do supported Oracle connectivity.  We are an 
enterprise and when I discussed this with management they came back and said we 
should just invest our time in ASP.NET. We can retrain our developers, and not 
worry about buying upgrades and we'll get new features as they come out. You 
know, I don't disagree with them. I just recently started playing with Visual 
Studio .Net, and it's far easier to write web services and create great web 
content.

Adobe thanks for the memories, a user/developer since version 4.5.

- Charles


On 7/30/07 5:27 AM, "Adam Haskell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I want to echo what Sean said...I looked at CF8 and thought, "wow finally a
product that I would really label Enterprise." Not to say CF7 wasn't
Enterprise, it had some great features and was a great release, but I think
the monitoring and some of the Administration changes helped make it really
enterprise friendly. Thats not mentioning the performance enhancements,
exchange integration (which currently means nothing to Lotus Shops bleh),
and whole suite of ajax tools that really make CF shine as a UI web layer
for large Java apps.

You have to look at this product and realize enterprise is worthless to you
unless you really need super scalability. Standard has it all, albeit
limited/throttled. Sure cfthread and exchange integration and PDF (?) are
throttled but they are available and until you have 100+ (dare I say
probably more) concurrent users using the exact same functionality
Enterprise means very little. Its like a computer, my Mom doesn't need a
dual core 64bit AMD with 2gig of ram and 256mb dedicate graphics card
running iSCSI to send me pictures and read email (unless she is running
Vista then she might ;) ). Gone are the days where you have to have
enterprise to play with those nifty event gateways. If enterprise looks to
expensive to you then you probably don't need it, or you need to look at
some other Enterprise software costs and revisit in 15 minutes. Hell I say
that single move by Adobe to offer a more complete Standard Edition will
open more doors for ColdFusion than any single feature. I say Bravo!

Adam Haskell

On 7/30/07, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/29/07, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As for your post on CF 8 being a dead product because of the price
> > increase, note that the increase if for Enterprise. How many people
> > here (other than me) actually use or need enterprise.
>
> Me!
>
> To be honest, the difference between $3,000/CPU and $3,750/CPU is
> pretty negligible in an enterprise world. For the - new-in-8 -
> (multi-)server monitoring and RDS/Admin user management features,
> unlimited CFTHREAD and unlimited MS Exchange integration, that extra
> $750/CPU is well worth it (as well as the general reasons Enterprise
> is worth paying more for: unlimited event gateways, PDF/document
> services, reporting etc).
>
> The key thing everyone should be rejoicing about is that Standard
> Edition includes: event gateways, pdf/document services, cfthread, MS
> Exchange integration, reporting, presentation generation. There would
> be a lot of complaints if these were Enterprise only features. There
> were plenty of complaints around CFMX 7 because event gateways were
> Enterprise-only!
> --
> Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
>



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade to ColdFusion 8 and integrate with Adobe Flex
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:284840
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to