Ah, ok. Well, that is actually a frequently discussed option too! :-) --- Ben
-----Original Message----- From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 1:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Adobe ColdFusion IDE survey lol, Ben I think you should read that better, I was asking for Coldfusion itself to be free. And I would pay for the IDE :-) On 1/8/08, Ben Forta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, free is a valid option, which is why it is listed there! :-) > > --- Ben > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 12:48 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Adobe ColdFusion IDE survey > > Ben, > > When looking at the survey, one of the important things was how much > would you pay. > > The one thing that I would like to add to that is I selected free, > only because I couldn't add any reason behind that. My reasoning is > this, Coldfusion is loosing ground in areas that I will not debate > here. However my logic is this, I would love to see Coldfusion itself > 100% free and the IDE I would pay for as long as it supported what I > needed to do my job. > > So if Adobe was to take on CFEclipse, and throw support at it, I am > prepared to pay for that. I guess to take on .Net and others I would > like to see something that is as comparable to those models. > > Anyway I know I can dream :-) > > > On 1/8/08, Ben Forta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Todd, > > > > You are jumping to conclusions. No one has said that we'll not do what you > > are suggestions. Actually, at this point no one has said anything at all, > > other than A) a CF IDE ranks as one of the top feature requests, B) we'd > > like more input from the community to help drove decision making. That's > it > > - for now. > > > > --- Ben > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 11:43 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: Adobe ColdFusion IDE survey > > > > Hopefully this won't be yet another ColdFusion Studio "now you see it, now > > you don't." I don't understand why they don't just throw some money at > > CFEclipse or fix issues inside of DW. All I see this doing is messing up > > the Adobe Future-CS3 bundles they have. > > > > On Jan 7, 2008 11:36 AM, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > In case no one is reading RSS these days, > > > > > > > > > http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna/controller.cfm?handler=PostHandler&action > > > =click&postId=239231&nextPage=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Edcooper%2Eorg%2Fblog%2Fclie > > > nt%2Findex%2Ecfm%3Fmode%3Dentry%26entry%3D54F8B07D%2D4E22%2D1671%2D5D4901CA2 > > 8DF6919 > > > -- > > > Tom Chiverton > > > Helping to vitalistically leverage sexy products > > > on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:296034 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
