It doesn't look like we have A/V running on those boxes (at least as
far as I can tell, and we're currently without a sysadmin who could
tell me for sure  [we're taking resumes :) ]

Thanks, though.

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tried disabling antivirus on the production box?
>
> A few years ago I had the same problem. It turned out it was some javascript
> code that A/V for did not like for some reason.  This was with Norton.
> Canned Norton and went to NOD32... never looked back.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 10:47 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CF7 Enterprise performance compared to Standard
>
> I'm not finding any references to this in the documentation on the
> differences between Standard and Enterprise (CF7), but was wondering
> if there are unpublished differences between the two servers.
>
> On my local machine, I'm running CF7 Developer edition.  Our
> production boxes for this application are running CF7 Standard (which
> they probably shouldn't be).  I have a block of code which takes 67ms
> to run on my local box (this is while I'm also running hog
> applications like Firefox and iTunes).  That same code on the
> production boxes takes 300+ms  (which may not sound like that much,
> but that code can run multiple times on a single request).
>
> I'm trying to figure out why the production boxes (which by specs are
> a lot beefier than my development box, which is a Dell laptop running
> XP).
>
> Here are some of the things we've considered (but basically ruled out):
>
> 1) RAM - the production boxes have the same amount of RAM (2GB)
> 2) Processors - development has 2Ghz Core2, while production have dual
> 1.7GHz Quad Cores
> 3) Traffic - Sadly, this application (which the boxes are devoted to)
> are very low traffic.  While they do get more traffic than my single
> IP address box gets, if they get two requests in the same minute, it's
> a busy day.
> 4) CF updates - the production boxes were on 7.01 while dev was on
> 7.02, but I've fixed that and seen no changes
> 5) JVM version - the production boxes have a JVM that's one "minor
> version" higher than mine, so that's probably not it.
> 6) Database access - the code in question doesn't actually hit the
> database servers (the one query it calls is a cached query). But, even
> if it did, the production boxes are in the same location as the DB
> servers, while my box is not, so you'd think that would make the
> production queries somewhat faster.
> 7) Code differences -- all of the code being called are exactly the
> same among the servers.
>
> That leaves us with Standard vs. Enterprise (which is essentially what
> the developer version is), but nothing I've found so far suggests
> there are those kinds of performance enhancements in Enterprise.
>
> What else should I consider, assuming that's not it?
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------
> Scott Brady
> http://www.scottbrady.net/
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:306090
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to