What if you have a template with just the follow: <cfset var = "Hi"> <cfoutput>#var#</cfoutput>
Run it on both the development box and the production box. Do you get the same thing? The template running slower on the production box? -----Original Message----- From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 11:28 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF7 Enterprise performance compared to Standard It doesn't look like we have A/V running on those boxes (at least as far as I can tell, and we're currently without a sysadmin who could tell me for sure [we're taking resumes :) ] Thanks, though. On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tried disabling antivirus on the production box? > > A few years ago I had the same problem. It turned out it was some javascript > code that A/V for did not like for some reason. This was with Norton. > Canned Norton and went to NOD32... never looked back. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 10:47 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF7 Enterprise performance compared to Standard > > I'm not finding any references to this in the documentation on the > differences between Standard and Enterprise (CF7), but was wondering > if there are unpublished differences between the two servers. > > On my local machine, I'm running CF7 Developer edition. Our > production boxes for this application are running CF7 Standard (which > they probably shouldn't be). I have a block of code which takes 67ms > to run on my local box (this is while I'm also running hog > applications like Firefox and iTunes). That same code on the > production boxes takes 300+ms (which may not sound like that much, > but that code can run multiple times on a single request). > > I'm trying to figure out why the production boxes (which by specs are > a lot beefier than my development box, which is a Dell laptop running > XP). > > Here are some of the things we've considered (but basically ruled out): > > 1) RAM - the production boxes have the same amount of RAM (2GB) > 2) Processors - development has 2Ghz Core2, while production have dual > 1.7GHz Quad Cores > 3) Traffic - Sadly, this application (which the boxes are devoted to) > are very low traffic. While they do get more traffic than my single > IP address box gets, if they get two requests in the same minute, it's > a busy day. > 4) CF updates - the production boxes were on 7.01 while dev was on > 7.02, but I've fixed that and seen no changes > 5) JVM version - the production boxes have a JVM that's one "minor > version" higher than mine, so that's probably not it. > 6) Database access - the code in question doesn't actually hit the > database servers (the one query it calls is a cached query). But, even > if it did, the production boxes are in the same location as the DB > servers, while my box is not, so you'd think that would make the > production queries somewhat faster. > 7) Code differences -- all of the code being called are exactly the > same among the servers. > > That leaves us with Standard vs. Enterprise (which is essentially what > the developer version is), but nothing I've found so far suggests > there are those kinds of performance enhancements in Enterprise. > > What else should I consider, assuming that's not it? > > -- > ----------------------------------------- > Scott Brady > http://www.scottbrady.net/ > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:306093 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
