Based on my experience with both: SeeFusion is cheaper and offers fewer features. It's solid works well and offers a lot of useful info for performance tuning and monitoring. It does lack many of the monitoring and controlling features found in FusionReactor. Also, you need a license of it for every physical server you have. So it may not be "cheaper" in the long run
FusionReactor has a lot more features and options. It can all sorts of things like automated tasks and scripts to fix common issues you encounter. It's quite a bit more expensive, BUT (and correct me if I am wrong, its been awhile) one enterprise license can cover many machines. It also features a single point interface, whereas with SeeFusion you must log into each server's SeeFusion interface separately. Now, what do you want to use it for? I use SeeFusion on our servers simply to performance tune applications. If you are making use of some of the more advanced features in FusionReactor, I don't think you will be able to switch to SeeFusion, it just doesn't have all of the tools you'll find in FusionReactor. HTH =] -- Alan Rother Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer Manager, Phoenix Cold Fusion User Group, AZCFUG.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:315382 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
