I'll second this; dumping FusionReactor to spend money on SeeFusion is taking a step backwards.
mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/ 2008/11/18 Alan Rother <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Based on my experience with both: > SeeFusion is cheaper and offers fewer features. It's solid works well and > offers a lot of useful info for performance tuning and monitoring. It does > lack many of the monitoring and controlling features found in FusionReactor. > Also, you need a license of it for every physical server you have. So it may > not be "cheaper" in the long run > > FusionReactor has a lot more features and options. It can all sorts of > things like automated tasks and scripts to fix common issues you encounter. > It's quite a bit more expensive, BUT (and correct me if I am wrong, its been > awhile) one enterprise license can cover many machines. It also features a > single point interface, whereas with SeeFusion you must log into each > server's SeeFusion interface separately. > > > Now, what do you want to use it for? I use SeeFusion on our servers simply > to performance tune applications. If you are making use of some of the more > advanced features in FusionReactor, I don't think you will be able to switch > to SeeFusion, it just doesn't have all of the tools you'll find in > FusionReactor. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:315397 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
