C++ was only efficient before MS developed the bloated MFC...
Remember OWL? Now there was efficiency....
----- Original Message -----
From: "DeVoil, Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 4:02 AM
Subject: RE: Assembler.....
> Mike,
>
> Yes, you could write COM objects in assembler.
> COM is a language-independent binary standard.
>
> But I wouldn't do that if I were you.
> C++ is pretty efficient too you know.
>
> Nick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 8:26 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Assembler.....
>
>
> Lately I wuz thinking of picking up an extra language to add to my long
list
>
> of the ones I currently know ;) As most people know you can develop custom
> COM, CORBA, CFX & other types of add-ons using alot of different languages
> like C++, VB, Java etc. etc.
>
> What I am wondering is if anyone out there knows if I can create COM or
CFX
> extensions through assembly/assembler language. I know its a pretty old
> language but its also pretty efficient. If anyone has anything to comment
> about this, please do ;) I will be one extremely greatful person.
>
> TIA,
> Mike
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> Information in this email is confidential and may be privileged.
> It is intended for the addressee only. If you have received it in error,
> please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
> You should not otherwise copy it, retransmit it or use or disclose its
> contents to anyone.
> Thank you for your co-operation.
> **********************************************************************
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
