I like all the tools in the same IDE. And I'm not running 3.5. > That would give you a separate Eclipse install.
So, choosing the install type of "Standard ColdFusion Builder Installation" ends up with Eclipse installed? Either approach I take I end up with the same thing? Eclipse first, then CFB...or CFB first and end up Eclipse anyway. A little odd... Think I'll just abort my current installation of CFB and install Eclipse 3.4, and then CFB as a plug-in if that's the case... -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 11:20 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CF9 and Bolt in eWEEK >> 3. Run CFE and CFB in separate Eclipse installs. > > A good possibility. > > How about: > > 4. Install CFB as stand-alone. That would give you a separate Eclipse install. > Is installation of CFB as an Eclipse plug-in preferable to stand-alone > for some reason? No. But if you already have Eclipse installed and are using it for other things, you might prefer to have all your tools in the same IDE. Or you might not, since you can't run CFB in 3.5. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:324629 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
