I suppose another factor is that I've never dealt with anything other than 
MS-related products on the operating system and server level.  Always been on a 
Windows PC working with code running on IIS servers.

IIRC, when I first investigated JAVA, one of the issues was my level of 
inexperience with non-Windows servers/OS.






> With the economy and market as it is, and with current employment's 
> stability starting to wiggle, I'm being forced to investigate other 
> options.
> 
> I was curious what the group's thoughts were on the two above 
> technologies and which would be easier/more natural to move into.
> 
> Not intending to abandon CF at all, but this is a time where 
> flexibility will be key and I'd like to be able to spread a wider net 
> should job seeking become a factor again.  Through a couple early 
> searches, there are a few opportunities that list CF as a *PLUS*, 
> while the core competency is either .NET or JAVA.  
> 
> I've looked into .NET a bit, but it seems that for someone with no 
> access to anything on a large scale (Sharepoint, etc.), there's only 
> so far you can go learning .NET in your basement.  There's also the 
> factor of ".NET" not being ONE language, but a combo of several techs 
> rolled into one.  I'm curious if .NET, while a web development 
> language, might just look easier to the inexperienced eye?
> 
> JAVA is a different beast altogether, but seeing as I've been making 
> use of some JAVA in CF7 and CF8 a little here and there, it seems like 
> it would be somewhat familiar at least in the critical getting started 
> phase.
> 
> 
> Thoughts? 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325404
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to