Client is interested in obscuring that it's CF. They know that it's not fool-proof by any means. They don't have anything against CF, obviously. If they were running a php site, they'd want to obscure that too.
Cheers, Kris On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Bryan Stevenson <br...@electricedgesystems.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 19:17 -0400, Dave Watts wrote: > >> I've never seen any compelling justification for doing this. > > > I've seen a client use it to password protect HTM/HTML files using the > benefits of good old application.cfm (being that it runs before any CF > file is run or those extensions mapped to be run via CF....meaning you > can use standard CF built security for non-CF files). > > Not Earth shattering stuff by any stretch, but a valid use beyond > vanity ;-) > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:334554 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
