I read it Sean. You said that I can't lay the fault at Adobe's door. And I disagree. The difference between ACF and Ruby and PHP isn't how zealous it's community is. CF zealots are some of the most involved and passionate out there. And you can choke a horse with the amount of tutorials and books available. The reason CF isn't more popular is because Adobe doesn't do enough in the marketplace to dispel the myths about CF and to try justify the cost of the product. They don't do enough to indoctrinate the next generations of developers.
That's my two cents anyway. On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Sean Corfield <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Michael Grant <[email protected]> wrote: > > If the success of CF isn't Adobe's responsibility then who's is it? > > Didn't you read what I said? > > >> Remember: the success of PHP, Ruby and other languages has come about > >> _without_ a company spending money on marketing. Those languages have > >> become popular because their users - their communities - have > >> evangelized and created tutorials and books and great free open source > >> software and so on. You can't lay the fault at Adobe's door... > > Community promotion made PHP, Ruby et al popular. > > Sean > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:340809 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm

