I have to agree here, the fact that one has to pay for the product in the first place, means that the responsibility of this company making money of this product is back in their court. By not promoting the product, getting it out into areas that haven't even heard of the product, is like saying I am not interested in whether I make money of this product or not.
It is not the communites, or current set of developers job to help make Adobe money, that is and always will be Adobe's responsibility for as long as the product costs money. Regards, Andrew Scott http://www.andyscott.id.au/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Quackenbush [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, 14 January 2011 12:09 PM > To: cf-talk > Subject: Re: Is Coldfusion losing it biggest asset? > > > Of course it is (now) Adobe's responsibility to make its offerings (CF, in this > case) successful in the marketplace. And CF **is** extremely successful in > the marketplace. You and Adobe's idea of marketplace just happen to be > two different things. But since their business relies on their marketplace, > their opinion is the only one that matters. > > All of that said, you entirely missed Sean's point, which was, by the way, > accurate. :-) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:340811 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
