It was when it first came out so I am a bit hazy on the details. I am
connected over the network to our dev, staging and Prod servers. I really
can't develop locally. I have no problem with CFE/Aptana. But DW can be
sluggish at times.

Since I had one license (and not aware that I could do two installs) I had
CFB on my personal lappy so I could use it  @ work and home. It was a 1 yr
old HP consumer model -- 2.3 duel core, 4 gig ram, etc. Not fast but not
slow either.

I just remembering it was really sluggish and took forever to gather all the
intellesense info for cfc's and all that. And after it spidered Devel it was
just a dog. I mean *typing* took forever, scrolling a page made is stutter
and stall. It was constantly stalling and or freezing up for 30 seconds to
5-10 + minutes at a time. Very frustrating. So after a couple of days of
reading up on it and finding work-a-rounds I needed to get stuff done and
went back to CFE.

Don't get me  wrong. I was really psyched about CFB. I am a certified IDE
junky. Hell, I even wrote Ray Camden and asked if he could get me into the
Beta program. I am starting to use it @ home recently and it works great on
smaller projects. I mean it is a really good tool.

Actually now that I can have two installs I am going to try it @ work again
with the update.

Thanx
G!

Oh yeah. Thanx for making pagination.cfc. I use it all the time.


On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Nathan Strutz <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Gerald,
>
> Your comments about CFB being slow bother me, and warrant some exploration.
> Can you provide more detail? Do you have projects set up into a shared dev
> environment over the network? I can't imagine that would be fast for any
> IDE.
>
> I have a copy of all my projects locally, I install CF servers locally (4
> different server versions), and I update my dev & test servers only by
> exporting from source control. Having these projects locally lets me do
> development without screwing with other developers' dev environments. I
> can't tell you how many times I was refactoring an application's guts at
> the
> same time a co-worker was working on a new feature (sorry Alan!). That kind
> of separation earlier in my career would have really cut down on people
> yelling at me.
>
>
> nathan strutz
> [http://www.dopefly.com/] [http://hi.im/nathanstrutz]
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Gerald Guido <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > >> Who is being flippant? It's a fact of life that some developer tools
> > cost money.
> >
> >
> > Going out on a limb here....
> >
> > It is all relative. Good tools cost do cost good money. But.... For some
> > here, $300 is chump change. For others, even the gainfully employed, that
> > could mean making a car or mortgage payment, or not. Times are tough. I
> > would wager that some of the folks here vocal about not complaing about
> it
> > not being expensive have incomes in excess of six figures, or close to
> it.
> > For those people it is *not* expensive, but for independents or 9-5ers
> that
> > are struggling to put their kids though college  $300 *is* a good chunk
> of
> > change.
> >
> > I like CFB but it is a dog @ work. Our intranet has thousands of cfm's
> and
> > cfc's (it handles *all* of our internal business proccesses) and CFB is
> > about as nimble as a mastodon in a tar pit. So is it worth $300 in this
> > instance? Arguably not.
> >
> > Flame on Garth!
> >
> > G!
> >
> >
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:341443
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to