Thanks.
This is what I thought... I've only had experience with Java, but none with
JSP.
At 02:41 AM 12/25/00 -0500, John Foulds you wrote:
>Kind of.
>
>Not meant to be OO, but can be, in that you can include any java you want in
>a JSP page.
>
>John
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Hal Helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 11:02 PM
>Subject: RE: Fusebox
>
>
> > Michael, while Java is OO, JSP is really more a tag-based interface into
> > Java's capabilities and not really meant to be an OO environment.
> >
> > Hal Helms
> > == See www.ColdFusionTraining.com for info on "Best Practices with
> > ColdFusion & Fusebox" training, Jan 22-25 ==
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael She [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 9:14 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: Fusebox
> >
> >
> > At 05:39 PM 12/24/00 -0500, Hal Helms you wrote:
> >
> > >Yes, there's definitely that argument, Dave -- and it's a good one.
>Someone
> > >once posted a question on the CFObjects forum, "If you're going to do OO,
> > >what not just do Java?" I'm still waiting to hear a good answer.
> > >
> > >I think CFObjects can be a good bridge for folks moving from CFML to a
>true
> > >OO language such as Ruby or Java.
> >
> >
> > Out of curiousity, is JSP OO?
> > --
> > Michael She
> > I m a g i n e C o m m u n i c a t i o n s
> > Company E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Personal E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ICQ UIN: #243466
> > Personal Homepage: http://www.michaelshe.com (Under Construction)
> > Imagine Communications: http://www.imagineer.net
> > PGP Fingerprint: 9A24 1DA9 39B8 0A0C C5ED 6E5D 45E9 075A 51CD 66A1
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
