To be clear, even on Edge or 56K dial-up, non-cached Jquery, with all its built-in goodness, arrives in less than a second...so...I really can't imagine why rolling your own "just-enough" JS would be better. At least when it comes to speed/performance.
Now, certainly, if you need to do X and Jquery doesn't help with X, that's a different story. But, since I started playing with Jquery, I've yet to find an "X." On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Dominic Watson < [email protected]> wrote: > > I'd argue with that being better. Custom handlers for different > responses allows you to tailor the reaction to failures either > globally or case by case - you could open a new window with an error > report, show a nice message for the user, do nothing, etc. > > I'm sure that your ajaxGet and ajaxPost methods are well written and > do their job - but using jQuery goes well beyond a couple of ajax > methods as I'm sure you know. Have you used jQuery Claude? (Ray, that > is who the nameless one is - name appears on the HOF site ;)? > > On 19 May 2011 15:24, <> wrote: > > > Better than that : they open a new window to display the CF error dump in > case the called template caused an error. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344688 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
