Interesting. Thanks for satisfying my curiosity there. :) On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Sandra Clark <sclarkli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Pretty much. To them, XML equals a fusebox like approach and they want to > get away from FB. Which is a shame, cause I'm very comfortable with MG > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcam...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 9:13 AM > To: cf-talk > Subject: Re: The age old Question. Which framework > > > I'll ditto the FW/1 recommendation, but I'm curious about why XML makes > Model-Glue not an option? The powers that be don't like XML? > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Sandra Clark <sclarkli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> So I'm on a new contract and part of the contract requirements is >> converting an old fusebox (procedural) app to a newer framework. I've >> mostly been doing Model-Glue in past few years, but because of the XML >> setup, it doesn't seem to be an option here. >> > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:351959 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
