I agree Dave, Sometimes we are stuck supporting legacy code while upgrading platforms (newer servers and newer CF versions). I had to do this for one client. I finally convinced them to switch from the COM version of PDFLib to the new Java version that was available. At least in this case the there was an alternative. So yes, I agree that using an alternative to COM is a good thing, however there may be legacy cases that we are forced to support. Adobe "should" work on integrating the 64 BIT jIntegra http://j-integra.intrinsyc.com/ .
Regards, Wil Wil Genovese Sr. Web Application Developer/ Systems Administrator CF Webtools www.cfwebtools.com [email protected] www.trunkful.com On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Dave Watts <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jiminy Christmas, we live in a 64 bit world now, come-on Adobe! > > We also live in a .NET world. I'm not sure how many Adobe customers > use COM any more. I would not recommend the use of COM from CF, based > on its history of poor performance as a COM client. > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > http://training.figleaf.com/ > > Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on > GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized > instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:354049 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
