> This seems to work, no?

No. It doesn't allow for quite a number of completely legit characters,
notably the + sign (which is very common), amongst others. That said, this
is the fault of the original regex, not your fix for it.

My feedback on this got too long for a response here, so I wrote it up on
my blog:
http://adamcameroncoldfusion.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/email-address-validation-1-in-series.html

-- 
Adam


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:354666
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to