> If I am using a hardware load balancing router (such as Cisco
> LoadDirector, or F5, or Alteon, etc), my application does not use
> Session variables, and my Client variables are stored in the database...
>
> Is there any benefit in using ClusterCATS in addition to my
> hardware load balancer?
>
> I already have users being directed to the server with the least
> load. I already have dead servers being taken out of rotation.
OK, ClusterCats does one thing that hardware will never do - CF processing
balancing
ClusterCats will send requests to the least busy server for CF requests
while hardware ones will only sent to ones which are still active (ping wise
usually), also ClusterCats will determine if CF isn't running and won't send
to there...
Philip Arnold
Director
Certified ColdFusion Developer
ASP Multimedia Limited
T: +44 (0)20 8680 1133
"Websites for the real world"
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
**********************************************************************
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
