On the contrary we all have been writing code, not just CF, but ASP, C,
Perl, and Java for quite a few years. We even had a consultant from Allaire
come out and do a code review. We passed with flying colors, under heavy
load, CF bogs down big time. I'm not sure what you consider "heavy" but we
get over 500,000 page views per day, between ucomics, doonesbury and
garfield. The problem became so bad that we wrote our own scripts that
generate static htm's nightly. Our site is now 75% static and runs about
75% faster. I'm not knocking CF at all it's great for what it does do, but
it does not scale. I'm sure there are some others out there that agree.
-Matt
Matthew-
I don't agree with your statement that CF doesn't scale. It will scale as
well as the code which is run on it. Possibly these people working for busy
CF sites are not experienced in writing scalable code?
-
jason.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Server" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: RE: Page execution time too long?
>
> 150 millisecs under no load would cause some alarm for me personally.
We
> tested our pages under no load and they ran in under 100 millisecs, under
> simulated load (silk performer), they jumped to well over 1,000. As I'm
> sure anyone working for a busy CF site will tell you, Cold Fusion does NOT
> scale well at all. If you're concerned about page times under ideal
> conditions...it's all down hill from there.
>
> Matthew Taylor
> Web Developer
> 617.868.0009 ext.216
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.uClick.com
> http://www.uComics.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allan Pichler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:38 PM
> To: CF-Server
> Subject: RE: Page execution time too long?
>
>
> IMHO 150 millisecs is not too much. As far as a general guideline on the
> maximum execution of pages i would have to say that depends on application
> you're building. I have had routines that took several seconds to process
> but that was still acceptable since it was performing some relatively big
> calculations.
>
> Allan Pichler
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 7:29 AM
> To: CF-Server
> Subject: Page execution time too long?
>
>
> I wondered if there are any guidelines for a maximum amount of miliseconds
a
> page should take to process. I have a page which takes 150milliseconds to
> execute is this acceptable?
>
> What do others recommend should be the maximum execution time of a page??
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
