------Nathan Wrote---------
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 07:51:44 -0600
From: Nathan Stanford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cold Fusion vs. Ihtml
Message-ID: <31D979D84265D311B5E700105A29944C50DF87@NTEXCHANGE>
Can you get the people who swear that CF is inferior to tell you what is bad
about CF and what is good about ihtml?
Kind of a Pros and Cons
then we can tell you what is accurate and what is not accurate.
----------Jaye Writes-------------
What the guys are saying in the shop are this:
1. Ihtml is faster than cold fusion, because it runs as a DLL on the
server.
2. Ihtml's logic base is better and they find CF idosyncratic.
3. Supposedly Ihtml's back page processing is qualitativly better than
CF.
4. And lastly their position is that Ihtml does everthing and more than
cold fusion, therefore why should we change.
I was only able to find reference material about CF vs ASP. but not CF Vs.
Ihtml. Therefore I was hoping somebody did some benchmarking, and have
objective information. Please save me from Ihtml hell.
Jaye Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jayezero.com
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
