Tony Schreiber wrote:
> But I would be interested in hearing what you don't like about the idea...
My original reaction was similar if not a bit more restrained. My concern is
that I don't use fusebox myself and I think that this would limit the
usability of SMB because if my lack of familiarity with it.
If I use fusebox and SMB doesn't then is implementing SMB into a fusebox
site as difficult as implementing a fusebox based SMB into a non-fusebox
site?
I don't use fusebox. I don't have any plans to learn it and I think that my
plans to utilise SMB will therefore stop dead because I don't want to have
to learn a development methodology on top of learning to navigate through a
new codebase.
--
Remember, what we do here might seem like criminal
fraud but its not. Its marketing!
Scott Adams
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.pixelgeek.com/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
