> > Not before, and I honestly wasn't sure that I was going to release it in
> > fusebox, but I felt that I'd try the "method" and see how it worked with
> > SMB. I figured I'd end up with two versions, not that I want that though.
>
> Well speaking as the "guy what wrote it" do you think that anyone seeking
> to us or modify your code will need to know that much of the fusebox
> methodology?
Well, not really, assuming you plan to use SMB for its intended purpose.
The code most peolpe woudl modify (display code, navigation, etc) is the
same whether it's in fusebox or not. The things that fusebox changes
the most that I can see so far are the file structure (along with a lot of
includes) and the variable scopes. But if you're unhappy with the thread
display in SMB, you're going to edit the stuff in thread.cfm or
dsp_thread.cfm, either way, it's the same code.
Tony Schreiber, Senior Partner Man and Machine, Limited
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.technocraft.com
http://www.simplemessageboard.com ___Free Forum Software for Cold Fusion
http://www.is300.net ___________The Enthusiast's Home of the Lexus IS300
http://www.digitacamera.com ______________DigitA Camera Scripts and Tips
http://www.linklabexchange.com _____________Miata Link ECU Data Exchange
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
