will you just listen?
we send about 100 newsletters.
and it's right the opposite.
HTML is giving out more clickthrough rate
then this ugly texty blexty.
Michael.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dick Applebaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:36 AM
Subject: Re: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
> Note that most ugs don't accept html format emails... too much bandwidth.
>
> IMO, html formatted email is like glitzy junk mail.... straight to the
trash
>
> Dick
>
> At 1:09 AM +0200 4/25/01, Michael Lugassy wrote:
> >Writing for non-html-support email programs are like writing html
> >for netscape....
> >
> >the war is over my friends..
> >
> >Michael.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "John Fix 3rd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:45 PM
> >Subject: RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
> >
> >
> >> LOL! So true.
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: zac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> >Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:03 PM
> >> >To: CF-Talk
> >> >Subject: RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Note that 80%+ of the e-mail programs are supporting HTML!
> >> >
> >> >Note that 0% of the internet standards for mail support it.
> > > >
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
